View Full Version : beech tc-45g
Glen in Orlando[_4_]
January 30th 09, 12:29 PM
-- 
Check it out http://gwatt.smugmug.com/Airplanes
Orval Fairbairn[_2_]
January 31st 09, 03:00 AM
In article >,
 "Glen in Orlando" > wrote:
Now, THAT'S a Twin Beech! ;>)
-- 
Remove _'s  from email address to talk to me.
Wayne Paul
January 31st 09, 04:14 AM
Glen,
During the time of production the Navy designation was SNJ-2.  Just like you 
see painted on the fuselage.  (I have a few hours in one of these; however, 
it was after the designation change so it is recorded in my log book as a 
TC-45.)
Wayne
http://www.soaridaho.com/
"Glen in Orlando" > wrote in message 
 g.com...
>
>
> -- 
> Check it out http://gwatt.smugmug.com/Airplanes
>
>
Peter Twydell
January 31st 09, 09:59 AM
In message >, Wayne Paul 
> writes
>Glen,
>
>During the time of production the Navy designation was SNJ-2.  Just like you
>see painted on the fuselage.  (I have a few hours in one of these; however,
>it was after the designation change so it is recorded in my log book as a
>TC-45.)
>
Slip of the finger there, Wayne. The Beech designation is SNB-2 (see 
rear fuselage). The SNJ was the NA T-6 Texan/Harvard.
>Wayne
>http://www.soaridaho.com/
>
>
>
>"Glen in Orlando" > wrote in message
 g.com...
>>
>>
>> --
>> Check it out http://gwatt.smugmug.com/Airplanes
>>
Splendid picture of a handsome aeroplane. What a colour scheme!
-- 
Peter
Ying tong iddle-i po!
Glen in Orlando[_4_]
January 31st 09, 12:27 PM
cool...
I can only go by what the N-Number database says... the deeper stuff is 
beyond me...
when I walk out on my company ramp to fly each night I see an MD-11, 757 & 
A300... Thank god.. cause if there were two 757's i'd be screwed!!  GRIN!!
Glen in Orlando
"Wayne Paul" > wrote in message 
 m...
> Glen,
>
> During the time of production the Navy designation was SNJ-2.  Just like 
> you see painted on the fuselage.  (I have a few hours in one of these; 
> however, it was after the designation change so it is recorded in my log 
> book as a TC-45.)
>
> Wayne
> http://www.soaridaho.com/
>
>
>
> "Glen in Orlando" > wrote in message 
>  g.com...
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Check it out http://gwatt.smugmug.com/Airplanes
>>
>>
>
>
Glen in Orlando[_4_]
January 31st 09, 12:27 PM
cool...
I can only go by what the N-Number database says... the deeper stuff is 
beyond me...
when I walk out on my company ramp to fly each night I see an MD-11, 757 & 
A300... Thank god.. cause if there were two 757's i'd be screwed!!  GRIN!!
Glen in Orlando
"Wayne Paul" > wrote in message 
 m...
> Glen,
>
> During the time of production the Navy designation was SNJ-2.  Just like 
> you see painted on the fuselage.  (I have a few hours in one of these; 
> however, it was after the designation change so it is recorded in my log 
> book as a TC-45.)
>
> Wayne
> http://www.soaridaho.com/
>
>
>
> "Glen in Orlando" > wrote in message 
>  g.com...
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Check it out http://gwatt.smugmug.com/Airplanes
>>
>>
>
>
Robert Moore
January 31st 09, 03:31 PM
"Wayne Paul"  wrote 
> During the time of production the Navy designation was SNJ-2.  Just
> like you see painted on the fuselage.  (I have a few hours in one of
> these; however, it was after the designation change so it is recorded
> in my log book as a TC-45.)
Yep! My hours came at NAS Norfolk during 1962-64, while attached to
FAETULANT. (Fleet Airborne Electronics Training Unit-Atlantic). We
junior aviator types normally flew our 8 hours per month proficiency
time in T-28s and S-2s, but our CO was more comfortable in the TC-45J.
He would naturally drag one of us along with him to split the flight
time.....or keep him alive. :-)
Bob Moore
PanAm (retired)
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.